After Train Wreck? Trump defends his ban on Muslims amid fierce liberal backlash

@ROliverLuce | 01-29-17

A fierce backlash, from the liberals of the Democrat party who lost the 2016 election. The America people want to be safe!

The only train wreck is those hundreds of protesters and liberal lawyers making a scene in the middle of busy airports over a few Muslims caught coming into the country! We are in another kind of COLD WAR with Islam pushing for Sharia dominance worldwide.

Banning Muslims is Constitutional according to the Muslim Hadith, the Quran, & the Sira in light of The Constitution!
No Matter what slight versions of these three holy books.
All Muslims must serve Allah as the only god. And his servant Mohammad is his prophet whereby all Muslims must emulate in various ways in their lives.

It’s only the liberal elements and other misguided people in our society who are fierce against the new American President who has been elected to stop this present Muslim invasion of North America. Mrs. Hillary’s liberal forces are attempting to STOP the ‘will’ of the people and their States!

President Trump is making good on a plan to SAVE the Republic from lawlessness and the invasion of Sharia. It is good that Muslims are stopped in their tracks and sent back from various airports to their own countries where Sharia is the LAW of the LAND THERE. Not here in America!

It’s all about our laws [Anti-Muslim laws of 1952, the Constitution.],
it’s all about our Constitution [No room for Sharia],
it’s all about WHY the Founding Fathers
initiated the founding of the U.S. Marines to fight the Muslims and quell their dangerous quest for world domination and world commerce.

The problem why Muslims look and sound innocent is due to their simple humanity.  They have feelings as well as other Americans.  But those feelings side with a sinister of a system of belief that is both political and religious.  This system comes from Islam’s holy (in their view) trilogy.  And they do have Imams that preach and teach them how and when to carry out Allah’s will accordingly.  Thus all Muslims must perform those dictates (in various personal ways) from those books that form the basis of Sharia (law).  This they do in pleasing their God, Allah.  When they enter another host country they must adhere to the ‘holy’ scheme of overpowering that host nation but in various stages according to how the will of Allah is best suited.

An example of a cultural jihad is taking over the streets and praying.  Another example would be groups of Muslims attending an American school and telling the school they are offended at a Christian cross or an American flag.  Every sane person should understand this kind of behavior is rude, no matter the religion.  It’s common sense to leave the country they are offended at.  When in Rome do as the Romans do!!

These jihadi stages depend on the Muslim’s growth in numbers.  The Muslim’s jihad activity also depends on how weak and useful the host nation’s population appears to them.  Muslims in each stage will grow progressively bolder with each type of cultural jihads.  Violent jihad is taken up by Muslims who are willing to be the soldiers of Islam for the glory of Allah.  The rest (the citizens of Islam if you will)  are the quiet but willing supporters.  Violent jihad can be used as a distraction from the cultural jihads that are being conducted.  Conducted by the peaceful Muslims who support the terrorist warriors.

Actually the advancement of Sharia depends on how quickly the other Muslim nations can push their numbers into the host country in question as well as how quickly Muslim families can produce babies.  Muslims are known for having 8 or more children per family.  And it also can be referred to as a jihad for the cause of Allah.

It’s all about  Sharia (law) in a creeping fashion in America!

Advertisement

Does @RaquelEvita Believe She is NOT a Muslim who Believes in Sharia? @FoxNews

~R.OliverLuce | 01-08-15

@RaquelEvita says she represents many peaceful Muslims and says, they DO reject radical terrorism which does not represent Islam.

Therefore I have put together a multi-faceted question for her:
So the following two items I am stating for you Raquel Evita Sarawati as a Muslim are two items you must then believe:
(1) There is no god but Allah.
(2) Mohammed is His prefect prophet.

And in the Quran you do know that you are to live as Mohammed lived, to speak and to act as he did.
So, in order to do as Mohammed does, you must look to the books of the Hadith and the Sira to gain understanding how he spoke, acted, and lived his life.
From his life then you are to believe Mohammed, because Mohammed himself has said, “he gets everything from Allah through the angel Gabriel.” And of course this statement of his is in the Quran itself.

Therefore, without my saying anymore information at this point in developing my question for you.
What would you say, at this point, that would make you any different from those who are the radicals, and their stealth-Jihadist Muslims who support their terror-military, and their Sharia Imams who say they are the true Muslims of Islam?

Again, what would be that difference between Raquel Evita Saraswati and them?
And, one more question, what does abrogation mean to you?

Reference:
Raquel Evita Saraswati’s appearance on FoxNews:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3978013773001/radical-imam-angers-muslims-non-muslims-with-op-ed/?playlist_id=trending#sp=show-clips