A Framework of Understanding: 3 Steps Toward A Special Marriage

~ROliverLuce | 05-05-15

That’s right! To put growth & maturity into a structural framework, we might see the progression of maturity possibly for our simple understanding.

We are drawn by God’s love & grace and we accept it through HIS Word of Truth (the Son) with our repentance and obedience and this is part of the Covenant what is called the ‘blood covenant’ (the servant covenant) as we initially commit to¬†by our repentance and our dying to self even MORE importantly through our professing IT in baptism symbolizing our death to sin. ūüôā Could I say this more clearly?

Oh, but we’re faced with becoming friends with Yeshua! That comes through familiarity. I guess that must be prayer, intercession, and praising HIS character that it might get into us, among other actions and attitudes. A covenant name for our friendship with God through His priesthood in approaching the Father is called the ‘Salt Covenant’ a step up in our ongoing maturity in Christ.

But we aren’t through yet in approaching the Marriage supper of the lamb yet. From our journey through ‘Salt,’ we come into yet another covenant of promise! The ‘covenant of inheritance’ what the Hebrew Torah calls the ‘Sandal covenant.’ Sandal as in foot-ware, lol. Here as friends with the Father’s ‘Word of Truth’ we begin to understand our future and our hope that opens up our inheritance! A whole world opening up to the promise of an eventual marriage to God the FATHER’s ‘Word of Truth & Promise’ for all eternity!

Well, like I mentioned above our ongoing maturity is much more dynamic than having to go through each mini-covenant of the Father’s Covenant (Genesis 15:17) rather than going through each stage separately. God’s character of common sense (if you will) tells us this :-).

Thanks for listening to my take on our coming marriage with Yeshua that is… to be! ūüôā


The Mystery of God’s Hebraic “Word of Promise” & His Death to Save us from Sin

~ROliverLuce | 04-10-15

[ Why did Jesus, the Christ, die on the cross, and in doing so, did it for our sins that He might remarry us in a Ketubah? Why? ]

This is where the “Tanakh” (the OT) book comes into the spotlight! The “Renewed Covenant” (the NT) book explains and reveals the progressive enlightened salvation in a book what we call the Old Testament (OT) that culminates in God’s living “Word of Sacrifice & Promise” coming in the form of sinful flesh for our salvation!

Now to explain a little how the Old Testament (OT) and the New Testament (NT) works together to reveal our salvation first!
The Old Testament is all about God’s Covenant from God’s Word of Promise. It also is about the story of man’s sin nature and God’s progressive revelation of His Word of Promise to come! That His Word (which He spoke) will come in the flesh to show the way! No more will we have to have “initial FAITH” in God’s Word to [then] bring an animal sacrifice any longer! But now with God’s progressive revelation of His Word of Promise we see the bridegroom giving His life for us that our payment for our sins is now paid in full. This is where “our FAITH” in God will now reside! It resides in His Son, His living Word forever!

Finally, I want to bring this into the picture! The ancient Hebrew marriage and wedding process is spelled out in the structure, the story and the details of the ancient Hebrew Ketubah. Ketubah is the Hebrew word for the Jewish marriage Covenant process made up of three actual sub or mini-covenants leading up the marriage covenant ceremony its self-described and outlined in the Old Testament (Tanakh).

So, the Hebrew marriage covenant would always progress through the three mini-covenant steps(1) with the bridegroom who must be committed all the way with no excuses(2) except in the very beginning of the door opening by the bride to be! The bride is able to pull out at any time during the first three steps in the process prior to the marriage covenant. But if they both become married and she becomes impure (by another) or is found to be impure the result is a death in those rough and ancient days of old. [Life was tough with many demands in society then.] This is where the groom has four choices of which one is, if he chooses, will pay the fee of death with his death to pay for her impurity or sins! So God wants to re-marry us through His Word of Promise he will pay the bill for our sins by dying for us in our stead. And in actuality HE puts the law of sin and death on mute for our sakes. This is the meaning of Christ’s death and subsequent rising from the dead.

Now to clarify and summarize: The first five books we call the Torah is the actual description and outline of the “Ketubah” in the book of “Tanakh” (OT)!!

(1) The three sub or mini-covenants within God’s main overall Covenant of salvation (Gen.15:17) are the Blood Covenant, the Salt Covenant, and the Sandal Covenant.

(2) Except when he discovers the bride to be impure from which he has several options.

The American people to Bobby Jindal. Force the Courts to STOP Creating Law on Sexual Behavior

~R.OliverLuce | 01-26-15

@BobbyJindal: “If @iSupremeCourt strikes down GAY marriage bans, we must amend the Constitution[?]” Why?

[Everyone constitutionally has the right to marry the oppose sex. Please leave it alone. Invent your own UNION please.]

Why do that, Bobby Jindal?; The courts (both State and Federal) with many homosexual judges and other judges, as well, who lean toward favoring that gay behavior is a race and not a behavior, have gone too far.

Mr Jindal let us force these illegal actions back LEGALLY in the name of [their] re-defining Marriage! We must do so relenting’ly and without quitting until we can secure the republic and the Constitution! Shall we, sir?

It must be said with vigor that everyone has the right to marry the oppose sex constitutionally. They do!
Ok, then men and women who indulge in gay-sex behavior must unionize their own definition.
After all, the Boy Scouts of America did not EXIST until it was formed and they gave their organization a name that defined the Boy Scouts again of America!

Finally to define terms, Homosexual’ism is only a sexual behavior. These people who indulge this particular sexual behavior are still men and women without putting a medical knife to their bodies. Homosexual behavior has nothing to do with being born “that way.” Sex with the oppose sex is self evident and children are a protected class by their own parents. Why? Children are very impressionable and anything they are taught become gospel to them despite how they feel at the time. They are children who can be abused and setup for life doing any kind of preversion if we do not protect our children!

If homosexuals are not “born that way” then what are they? Certainly they are not a race of people but a class of people given and obsessed with the homo-sexual behavior. If these people want their behavior so badly they should simply come out and admit they want their lust and simply say they hate Christianity for branding lust as a sin. Further more, they must invent their OWN union, that depicts their own sexual behavior, instead of getting the courts to CHANGE the DEFINITION of MARRIAGE of one man with one woman. Why pick on others when they can HAVE THEIR OWN UNION INVENTION for all time.

Let us “live and let live.” Thank you. Let us allow the judges to do the right thing for righteousness sake!


Appealing to @iSupremeCourt to save ‘marriage’ that allows everyone to covenant w/the OPPOSITE sex

Appealing to the @iSupremeCourt to give homosexuals their own legal TERM that identifies gay unions for homosexual behavior.¬† The world knows that the word ‘marriage’ has always been forever.¬† To add homosexuals into marriage is changing the very definition and the very foundation of what marriage does and produces, i.e. opposite sex love and children.

Marriage has always been about A-man with A-woman. Equality in marriage is reached when ANY man¬†and ANY woman joined together as 1 man with 1 woman have access to be in covenant with each other in the terms of ‚Äúmarriage.‚ÄĚ
Marriage is about the opposite sexes joining together in covenant and having, almost all the time, fruit that produces children. Homosexuals do not produce this fruit nor do they qualify as opposite sexes joining together to enter the marriage covenant bond.

Long held century old definitions for terms that also may be LEGAL are important to maintain for any sane society that wants to maintain order and reasonable equality for all in varying moral situations through the years. So, another term must be used or invented (to bring equality and legal union status) for those who wish to indulge in aberrant sex. Therefore, we must allow these people ‘to gay unionize’ their commitments to each other in this wayward sexual behavior. Because of their outspoken voices and their false sense in believing that they are born gay, we do appease them in prayer and hopes that one day many will come to their senses through the power of God’s wisdom, BUT without harshness nor abuse towards them! We all need care in coming to our collective senses to eventually live the truth and never the lie which always have consequences in due season.

Now I wish to state an example why we must separate the two kinds of commitments, i.e. “Marriage” and “Gay Union”:¬† In Malaysia, Christians can not use the word “Allah” for their God. They must use another term, a different word perhaps the term, “God” for the purposes of communicating.

So, I ask the Supreme Court why are we changing the definition of the word, “marriage” for the first time in WORLD HISTORY?¬† Everyone knows what marriage means for both Christians and non-Christians alike. But these homosexual men and women who refuse to join with an opposite sex are NOT WITHIN the definition of “marriage” but are in a far different definition of another KIND of union, or commitment, or covenant.

May I purpose the word, ‘gay union’ or whatever term the people who differentiate themselves from the rest of us only through a different kind of sexual behavior which does not produce any fruit (children) biologically speaking.¬† Any people could adopt I suppose which is another issue.


America Court System is Creating[LAW] an Extreme Condition for Tearing Up The Constitution

by R.OliverLuce | 05-10-14

To the Supreme Court it must be mentioned the definition of marriage is and has always been between a man and a woman for centuries upon centuries in every civilized culture since Adam.

Who says the court has the RIGHT to CREATE LAW by dictating what is unconstitutional and violates the Constitution and the people who vote against the what doctors call unbecoming behavior for the human body in marriage of all places!

Never mind the rights of the same-sex behaviors being effected by the protection of marriage. They (the people with the gay behavior) ALL STILL have their right to marry the oppose SEX if they deem to do so; Their rights here have not been infringed upon! Everyone in the nation STILL has the right to marry; Marrying the oppose sex!
What is necessary is for these homosexuals to be given or invent a UNION that identifies the term, the institution as such. A union between same sex people who wish to stay together under that oath of same sex.

It is time for men and women everywhere to stop visiting the American court system until which time they have renounce the practice of creating law and must roll back every law that’s been based or acted upon from unconstitutional precedence and the simple creation of law that was meant for only the people and the legislative process. Any law voted on by the people will stand forever until which the people rescind it.

Attorney General Eric Holder Explains Excuses for Spread of Lawlessness

by R.OliverLuce | 02-25-2014

[The special treatment & the proselytizing of homosexualism on America with the allowance of massive numbers of illegal foreigners will bring heavy judgment upon the United States of America if we the people fail to rise again!]

The United States Attorney General Eric Holder in a meeting with a group of Attorneys Generals from various states is saying that, “Any decision not to defend individual laws must be rare? Rare? And must be under ‘exceptional circumstances?’ There are? And furthermore he added , that challenges to ‘gay marriage bans’ would qualify as a circumstance?

Might I add, shall we educate an Attorney General that first there MUST be a change in law? A change in law that would allow homosexuals who want unions for tax and federal benefit reasons.

To create unions for the homosexual behavior would go along way toward retaining the definition of marriage as one man and one woman. To suggest that homosexual behavior can be included into the institution of marriage is to RE-DEFINE the meaning of MARRIAGE and thus make marriage constitutional. Constitutional? We all know that all MEN and all WOMEN including those who call themselves gay sexuals can marry without being denied. Everyone is able to marry if they choose the opposite sex. That is the definition of marriage! To open up the same sexes to unions, [who cannot have children and indulge in a sexual behavior that will never produce offspring], would take a creation that would allow a new class of behavior to unionize for tax and benefit reasons among the primary ones.

Therefore, marriage is for all humans who want to marry the opposite sex and those who want to indulge in behavior with the same sex must have their own rightful union that does not infringe the definition of marriage which is the foundation of society of which is now being attacked through godlessness.

This is the foundation to save marriage. If we can not save the definition of marriage as an institution with the inclusion of Homo Unions then this country is going to have a revolution. This kind of lawlessness by our leaders can not continue nor be tolerated. For lawlessness will lead to marshal law and that will lead to civil war with the destruction of all liberal forced institutions that run against our constitution that has been gainsaying many of Americans into believing the lies. Hopefully all Americans will wake up this year. For we have important elections in the fall of 2014.

Now with the acts of treason by President Obama and his NOT enforcing the laws and the borders of our nation, Eric Holder gives unconscionable excuses and the tearing down of definitions of words and terminologies that is leading to the deconstructing of society as we know it. We see how this is explained away. But for those of us who know what they are doing, all this will continue to be confronted. America was never meant to be degraded into perversion and lawlessness for the art of liberal Utopian control.

#NoAmnesty #GaysexCivilUnions #MarriageISforEVERY1


AG Holder Gives Nod To States to Break Laws {As leaders go,so go the people}

Gay Marriage Collides With Religious Liberty

Homosexuality; An Intrinsic Evil

Homosexuality, An Intrinsic Evil
By R OliverLuce | 07-08-2013

It’s all about evil attempting to PROVE God approves of their gaysex BEHAVIOR in re-defining the centuries old Marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, I repeat, 1 man & 1 woman.

The excuse that marriages are falling apart is an excuse to re-define marriage? The spread of soft/hard porn by liberal elements of our society has brought about the increase in divorces. Why not fix our problems instead of pushing perversion?

If these people who are obsessed with a god of lust for the same sex are so obsessed in wanting a UNION, then it’s a MUST to invent a new TERM identifying EXACTLY what it is, a UNION-NAME giving the same gaysex people a UNION so they too can have their tax credits and HAND OUTS from our HUGE evil American Government.

The Supreme Court MUST take notice (wakeup) before their time is up!! What goes around DOES come around in every AGE!


Explaining George W Bush’s Stance on Gaysex Marriage

By R Oliver Luce | 07-07-2013

While George Bush is cautioning Americans and Conservatives against criticizing gaysex couples.

It must be understood there is a huge difference between criticizing homosexual sin in a person’s life and¬†contesting,¬†with reason,¬†their desire to prove their gaysex is normal by using **marriage, and standing for justice and the truth in the public square without being labeled a hateful person, in this context directed at homosexuals.

When George was asked, whether gaysex marriage conflicts with Christian values, Mr. Bush responded along¬†with, ‘taking the speck in the eye out when he has the log in his own eye’.

Either the former President does not understand God’s view and creation as it’s mentioned in the Bible or George doesn’t know how to respond without looking like he’s a hateful man because of the unrelenting P.C. that’s shoved on Americans.
It couldn’t be, George is all for gaysex redefining the centuries old understanding of marriage, I’m sure.
After all, intelligent people know how to invent another term that identifies a new idea for a different kind of union how be a kind of perversion.
Incidentally, the former President does confess to be a Christian who says he is born again into HIS Covenant of Love.


**If homosexuals are not attempting to prove to everyone and God that their gaysex behavior is normal why then destroy the centuries old definition of marriage in the first place with such vigor?

Explaining George W Bush’s Stance on Gaysex Marriage

Supreme Court On Verge Pushing Gay Sex Behavior On Marriage!!

Minnesota State Senators On Verge Pushing Gay Sex Behavior On Marriage
By R.OliverLuce | 05-13-2013

Author Patrick Condon tells us regarding protecting Christian rights: “But a majority of senators rejected a Republican amendment to increase the bill’s religious protections, as gay marriage supporters argued it would have gutted civil rights protections for gay people.”

This is a WAR with people pushing evil perversion on all of us to accept it.  They really are obsessed with proving God approves of gay sexual behavior & getting doctors to ignore the facts of life!!!

This is absolutely wrong, it’s a push to have God approve their behavioral life style. No one is created a homosexual. Homo sex is an action not skin color.¬† It is a behavior with a habitual obsession to it. And it can be treated if the person wants it badly enough. Love for the same sex is normal. Sexual lust for the same sex is not normal and the plumbing does not support it nor meaningfully except to addict the person. It can be seen as a drug. Taking drugs is NOT normal for people as we all know.

But homosexuals already have rights.¬† It’s already a crime to kill or beat anyone no matter if they be jerks or even homosexuals.¬† Marriage is available to EVERYONE.¬† If gays want to tie a knot of some kind then they simply should invent their own UNION-NAME in the name of COMMON SENSE!¬† Homosexuals already have rights!!


Homosexuals Must Invent Their Own Union-Name; Everyone Already Has the Right To Marriage

Homosexuals Must Invent Their Own Union-Name; Everyone Already Has the Right To Marriage

Redefining marriage for the first time in world history?

Changing it just to give a certain sex ‘behavior’ special rights?

Everyone has a path to sex! Even Homosexuals in their own homes.

Everyone has a path to marriage! For there is NO favoritism against neither man nor woman! Remember all homosexuals are either men or women initially created when they were born! Have we all gone crazy!

GAYISM, if it must, shall INVENT their own union-name in order to grab Federal benefits and the illusion that God created and ordained homosexual behavior. After all, gayism is simply that, behavior, an obsession to sexual behavior of a certain kind. And there are various types of sexual obsession and not just with gayism. Yes, I have coined the word “gayism” to mean homosexualism.