~R.OliverLuce | 01-26-15
@BobbyJindal: “If @iSupremeCourt strikes down GAY marriage bans, we must amend the Constitution[?]” Why?
[Everyone constitutionally has the right to marry the oppose sex. Please leave it alone. Invent your own UNION please.]
Why do that, Bobby Jindal?; The courts (both State and Federal) with many homosexual judges and other judges, as well, who lean toward favoring that gay behavior is a race and not a behavior, have gone too far.
Mr Jindal let us force these illegal actions back LEGALLY in the name of [their] re-defining Marriage! We must do so relenting’ly and without quitting until we can secure the republic and the Constitution! Shall we, sir?
It must be said with vigor that everyone has the right to marry the oppose sex constitutionally. They do!
Ok, then men and women who indulge in gay-sex behavior must unionize their own definition.
After all, the Boy Scouts of America did not EXIST until it was formed and they gave their organization a name that defined the Boy Scouts again of America!
Finally to define terms, Homosexual’ism is only a sexual behavior. These people who indulge this particular sexual behavior are still men and women without putting a medical knife to their bodies. Homosexual behavior has nothing to do with being born “that way.” Sex with the oppose sex is self evident and children are a protected class by their own parents. Why? Children are very impressionable and anything they are taught become gospel to them despite how they feel at the time. They are children who can be abused and setup for life doing any kind of preversion if we do not protect our children!
If homosexuals are not “born that way” then what are they? Certainly they are not a race of people but a class of people given and obsessed with the homo-sexual behavior. If these people want their behavior so badly they should simply come out and admit they want their lust and simply say they hate Christianity for branding lust as a sin. Further more, they must invent their OWN union, that depicts their own sexual behavior, instead of getting the courts to CHANGE the DEFINITION of MARRIAGE of one man with one woman. Why pick on others when they can HAVE THEIR OWN UNION INVENTION for all time.
Let us “live and let live.” Thank you. Let us allow the judges to do the right thing for righteousness sake!